Showing posts with label Mutual Funds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mutual Funds. Show all posts

Tracking Michael Price’s MFP Portfolio – Q4 2019 Update


  • Michael Price’s 13F portfolio value decreased from $723M to $715M this quarter. 
  • MFP Investors decreased Dolby Laboratories (DLB) during the quarter. 
  • The largest three individual stock positions are Intel Corporation (INTC), Dolby Laboratories (DLB), and S&W Seed Company (SANW) and they add up to ~27% of the portfolio. 

Michael Price’s 13F portfolio value decreased marginally from $723M to $715M this quarter. The portfolio is diversified with recent 13F reports showing well over 100 individual stock positions. The top five stakes are Intel Corporation (INTC), Dolby Laboratories (DLB), S&W Seed Company (SANW), CIT Group (CIT), and Bank of California (BANC) and they add up to ~35% of the 13F portfolio.

Below is a spreadsheet that shows the changes to Michael Price's MFP Investors 13F portfolio holdings as of Q4 2019. For a look at how the portfolio has progressed, see our previous update:




To learn more about how to profit from a strategy of following the best hedge fund picks, check out our book Profiting from Hedge Funds: Winning Strategies for the Little Guy .    




Tracking Robert & Jeffrey Bruce’s Bruce Fund Portfolio – Q4 2019 Update


  • Robert & Jeffrey Bruce’s 13F portfolio value increased from $482M to $513M this quarter. 
  • Bruce Fund increased Bausch Health during the quarter. 
  • The largest three individual stock positions are AMERCO, Nextera Energy, and Allstate (ALL) and they add up to ~27% of the portfolio. 

Robert & Jeffrey Bruce’s 13F portfolio value increased ~6% from $482M to $513M this quarter. Recent 13F reports have shown a total of around 50 positions. The largest five individual stock positions are AMERCO (UHAL), Nextera Energy (NEE), Allstate (ALL), Bausch Health (BHC), and CMS Energy (CMS) and they add up to ~39% of the 13F portfolio.

Below is a spreadsheet that shows the changes to Robert & Jeffrey Bruce's Bruce Fund Holdings US long portfolio holdings as of Q4 2019. For a look at how the portfolio has progressed, see our previous update:




To learn more about how to profit from a strategy of following the best hedge fund picks, check out our book Profiting from Hedge Funds: Winning Strategies for the Little Guy .    





Tracking Thyra Zerhusen’s Fairpointe Capital Portfolio – Q4 2019 Update


  • Thyra Zerhusen’s 13F portfolio value decreased one-third from $1.97B to $1.30B this quarter. 
  • Fairpointe Capital increased Adtalem Global Education (ATGE) and Corning (GLW) while reducing Molson Coors (TAP), Mattel Inc. (MAT), and Tegna Inc. (TGNA).  
  • The largest three positions are Molson Coors (TAP), Mattel Inc. (MAT), and Tegna Inc. (TGNA). 

Thyra Zerhusen’s 13F portfolio value decreased one-third from $1.97B to $1.30B this quarter. Recent 13F reports have shown a total of around 70 individual stock positions in the portfolio. The largest five stakes are Molson Coors (TAP), Mattel Inc. (MAT), Tegna Inc. (TGNA), Adtalem Global Education (ATGE), and Teradata Corp (TDC), and they together add up to ~18% of the portfolio.

Below is a spreadsheet that highlights the changes to Thyra Zerhusen's Fairpointe Portfolio 13F stock portfolio as of Q4 2019. For a look at how the portfolio has progressed, see our previous update:




To learn more about how to profit from a strategy of following the best hedge fund picks, check out our book Profiting from Hedge Funds: Winning Strategies for the Little Guy .    





Tracking Thyra Zerhusen’s Fairpointe Capital Portfolio - Q3 2016 Update



  • Thyra Zerhusen’s 13F portfolio increased from $4.42B to $4.44B this quarter.
  • Fairpointe Capital increased Stericycle & Tegna while reducing Nvidia.
  • The largest three positions are Copa Holdings, Juniper Networks, and Teradata.


Thyra Zerhusen’s 13F portfolio increased marginally from $4.42B to $4.44B this quarter. Recent 13F reports have shown a total of around 70 individual stock positions in the portfolio. The largest five stakes are Copa Holdings, Juniper Networks, Teradata (TDC), Varian Medical (VAR), and Alcoa (AA) and they together add up to ~20% of the portfolio.

Below is a summary of the major moves this quarter:

Stericycle Inc. (SRCL): SRCL is a new ~2.75% portfolio stake established last quarter at prices between $93 and $128 and increased by ~140% this quarter at prices between $77 and $107. The stock currently trades below those ranges at $76.51. For investors attempting to follow Fairpointe, SRCL is a very good option to consider for further research.

Interpublic Group (IPG): IPG is now a small 0.73% position. It is a very long-term stake established in 2011 and built-up in 2012 at a cost-basis in the low-teens. Last quarter saw a huge ~62% selling at prices between $22 and $25 and that was followed with a ~25% reduction this quarter at prices between $22 and $24.50. The stock is now at $23.50. Fairpointe is harvesting long-term gains.

DeVry Education (DV): DV is a 3.15% of the portfolio stake. The original position is from H2 2012 at a cost-basis of ~$20 per share. Last quarter saw a ~30% increase at prices between $16 and $20 and the stock is now at $31.75. There was a ~10% trimming this quarter. Fairpointe is starting to harvest gains.

Lions Gate Entertainment (LGF.A) (LGF.B): LGF is a 2.87% of the portfolio position established in Q1 2016 at prices between $18.55 and $32.39 and increased by just over one-third last quarter at prices between $19.55 and $23.43. There was a ~8% further increase this quarter. For investors attempting to follow Fairpointe, LGF is a good option to consider for further research.

Office Depot (ODP): ODP is a 2.38% portfolio stake built-up over the last three quarters at prices between $3.28 and $7.73. The stock currently trades at $4.95. This quarter saw a marginal increase.

Copa Holdings (CPA): CPA is currently the largest position in the portfolio at 4.23%. The original stake is from Q2 & Q3 2015 at prices between $41 and $112. There was a ~27% selling this quarter at prices between $52 and $91 and the stock is now at $92.91.

Tegna Inc. (TGNA): TGNA is a fairly large 3.13% portfolio stake. It was established in Q2 2015 at prices between $23 and $38. Last two quarters saw a ~45% increase at prices between $20 and $25 and the stock currently trades at $22.15. For investors attempting to follow Fairpointe, TGNA is a good option to consider for further research.

Below is a spreadsheet that highlights the changes to Thyra Zerhusen's Fairpointe Portfolio US long stock portfolio as of Q3 2016. For a look at how the portfolio has progressed, see our previous update:



To learn more about how to profit from a strategy of following the best hedge fund picks, check out our book Profiting from Hedge Funds: Winning Strategies for the Little Guy .    






Southwest Airlines (LUV) – Stock Analysis

As blogged previously, SWA’s personality identifies with our frugal consumer lifestyle. In the last fifteen years we have flown domestically 3-4 times annually and more than 90% of the time Southwest has been our airline of choice. Patience and flexibility help the “Wanna get away” fares go further. Southwest’s policy of generally staying away from the main airports in major cities works in our favor as that essentially reduces airport hassles. It also helps that we are a hop, skip, and a jump away from the Oakland airport, one of the top-10 secondary airports served by Southwest. Flight delays or missed baggage has not been our lot so far. However, the minimal catering fare is not commendable especially on coast-to-coast trips, usually in the same flight with one or more stopovers.

Airline industry is an extremely tough business with razor thin margins constantly squeezed and sandwiched between huge fixed costs and heavy regulation. Also with ticket pricing not regulated the formula is carved for an industry with companies competing their way into bankruptcy! Southwest Airlines sports a unique appeal as they were profitable for more than 35 continuous years. This achievement is especially significant considering they are a low-cost airline and as yet not a big player in the more lucrative business travel market.

Business Issues:

Southwest strives for a completely optimized smooth operation. A key factor behind that philosophy is employee productivity and is the distinguishing dynamic even when comparing SWA with other up-and-coming airlines emulating their business model. Specifically, Southwest’s unwritten rule of minimizing layoffs along with significant employee ownership has enabled them to nurture the industry’s most productive employees. It is remarkable that the philosophy stood the test of airline crisis following September 11, 2001. Southwest's strength compared to legacy airlines boil down to:
  • Liquidity: Southwest have been able to maintain a high level of liquidity while legacy carriers have long struggled to maintain profitability and have found it hard to raise capital in a low-cost fashion. Indirectly, this results in a combative relationship between the management and the labor unions as management’s effort to decrease costs by reducing salaries/benefits conflicts entirely with the interests of the labor unions, and
  • Solid Employee Relationship: Again, SWA has an admirable turnaround of aircraft at the terminal resulting from its highly cohesive relationship among employees in different silos. This is a tall order for legacy airlines as historically, the very rigid line among employees in different capacities make it hard to achieve shared goals.
Even so, there is a downside to Southwest’s strategy. Employee per aircraft, a key metric for performance measurement has varied between the high 60’s and the high 80’s – that number is better low. In a downturn, should the company decide to reduce fleet size, it is inevitable for this number to go high and in extreme cases can spin out of control.

Some well-known business optimization skills pioneered by Southwest that have successfully been adopted by other airlines include:
  1. Point-to-point short-haul network of flights instead of the hub-and-spoke method. Historically, hub-and-spoke was considered the most profitable method of running an airline as it allowed for concentrating maintenance staff in one location as well as consolidation of flights thus permitting for market share gains at the hubs which paves way for increased pricing power. Southwest blew away this concept by optimizing for quick turnarounds of aircraft at the gate. Even though, Southwest’s costs per aircraft per minute at the terminal is high, by minimizing the time at the terminal, Southwest proved that costs can be contained to be below hub-and-spoke operators. Further, hub-and-spoke is limited by airport capacity. Southwest’s passenger load factor (a measure of how much of an airlines passenger carrying capacity is used) is stuck in the low 70s and this is one area they can focus to improve.
  2. Use of a single aircraft type: Southwest exclusively employs Boeing 737 series aircraft for all its flights. This allows them to streamline operations and reduce cost.
Southwest maintains a fleet of 537 Boeing 737’s with an average age of slightly over 10 years. Of these, 210 (almost 40%) planes are aged over 17 years and the remaining 327 (more than 60%) are around 5 years. Effort is underway to replace some of the older fleet with new ones. In fact, their committed aircraft orders stand at 104 and the total including options and purchase rights add up to 220 over the next 5 years, remarkably close to the number of Southwest airplanes aged over 15 years. It can be deduced that Southwest does not anticipate fleet growth in the foreseeable future.

In keeping with the spirit of a low-cost no-frills airline, Southwest ran a highly successful no-hidden fees marketing campaign. This was especially successful because the timing of the campaign was precisely when competition increasingly started charging fees for almost everything not nailed on - additional baggage, ticket change, booking etc. Southwest has managed to keep add-on fees to a minimum although nominal fees for certain things were introduced recently for –
  • From the 3rd checked-in baggage onwards, and
  • Unaccompanied minors and for pets.
Other minor business decisions that directly affect the Southwest customer experience include:
  • Single ticket class. There is no first-class or business class or elite class on Southwest flights. Recently, they introduced Business select, a glorified regular ticket with preferential seating privilege.
  • Tickets are almost exclusively purchased directly from the airline (phone or website) thus eliminating middle-men (travel agents and other travel sites).
  • No seat assignments: The boarding pass does not have a seat number assigned and one can choose a seat as long as it is unoccupied. Boarding first is critical and Southwest introduced a new boarding process last year in an attempt to minimize the time customers spent in line. Basically, passengers are assigned to one of three boarding groups depending on check-in time. Online check-in 24-hours in advance is available and if boarding first is a priority, early online check-in is recommended.
These initiatives help create a unique experience for Southwest’s customers and most tend to become loyal. There is a level of resistance among customers that have flown on other airlines to switch to Southwest – the oft cited excuses include lack of service in their “home” airports, and frequent flyer benefits customers wanting to take advantage of, etc. This is a challenge for Southwest as they have not focused enough on the business customer. Southwest’s focus on servicing from secondary airports has slowed its ability to service business customers who prefer main airports despite the consequences. SWA effort to play this market is proving to be a painfully slow process – many of the primary airports are operating at capacity and making the entry tough as costs can quickly become prohibitive. Philadelphia and Denver are success stories and New York should soon follow suit with Southwest’s successful bidding for the 14 take-off and landing slots in La Guardia from ATA airlines, a code-share partner that went bankrupt last year. Minneapolis is another location expected to be served starting March 2009. For Southwest to grow at a healthy rate they need to carve a niche in this area and it is imperative for them to revamp the business model to serve this customer base in a satisfactory manner. The top-three Southwest airports are Las Vegas, Chicago (Midway), and Phoenix. It is expected to remain this way as Southwest cannot afford to lose market share in these routes while attempting to expand in other areas. Southwest’s commitment to existing locations is evident in its support for the extensive plan to revamp the Love Field airport in Dallas, Southwest’s home base.

Another critical route that Southwest has not chartered yet but will need to for growth is International operations. So far, focus has been on local flights but given the size of the airline and the expected stagnation in the domestic market, Southwest will have to tackle the international market sooner than later. Their forays into this space have been modest with a couple of code-share agreements with airlines serving Canada and Mexico - West Jet of Canada and Volaris of Mexico. This could be especially challenging as many of the business strategies that worked well to optimize the domestic area will not apply when the horizon broadens and in certain cases can be counter-productive. For example, Southwest will not have the luxury to work with a single type of airline as it will not be suitable for transcontinental flights.

Financials:

The year over year (yoy) revenue growth for Southwest stood at a respectable 11.8% at the end of 2008. Net income was down 72.4%. Below is a consolidated look at their financials over the last four years:



Year2008200720062005
Operating Revenue$11.02B$9.86B$9.09B$7.58B
Operating Expenses$10.57B$9.07B$8.15B$6.86B
Net Income$178M$645M$499M$484M
Net Margin1.6%6.5%5.5%6.4%
Fleet Size537520481445




Revenue went up almost 50% over the last four years. Fleet size increased around 20% over the same period. Net income was all over the place as it stayed steady in the 2nd year, showed a growth of almost 30% in the 3rd year followed by a decline of over 70% last year, clearly demonstrating the cyclic nature of the business.

The company finished 2008 with 1.8B in cash. In a tough credit environment, this is an achievement in itself. $891M was generated in fourth quarter of 2008 by tapping the revolving credit facility and the loan market – these are comparatively expensive loans at an interest rate of over 10%. Additionally, 346M was generated through sale and lease back transactions of ten of its Boeing 737-700 aircrafts. The company still owns about 83% of its aircraft fleet and the non-mortgaged aircraft market value stood at $8-$9B giving a Debt to Capital ratio of 45 % at EOY 2008. As Southwest demonstrated, using sale-and-lease back is a good option that the company can tap in tight credit environments.

Southwest’s hedging strategy accounts for its outstanding performance relative to other airlines in the last few years. When fuel price fluctuated between $35 and $150 last year, Southwest’s hedges at $51 came in real handy and helped it remain profitable. Southwest guessed right that fuel prices were artificially low in the 2003 timeframe by purchasing forward contracts at low fixed prices. As fuel prices rose over the last few years, these contracts rose in value thereby offsetting a substantial portion of its expenses to purchase fuel at higher prices. This is going to be hard to replicate moving forward. As of the end of last year, Southwest participated in 85% of the fall in energy price as they significantly reduced fuel hedges through 2013. As of March 2009, Southwest has started to become more active as they have hedged 29% and 27% of its estimated fuel needs for 2009 and 2010 respectively, primarily using call options at $66. Below is a look at fuel price as percentage of total operating expenses for the last four years:



YearCostAverage Cost Per GallonPercent of Operating Expenses
2008$3.71B$2.4435.1%
2007$2.69B$1.8029.7%
2006$2.28B$1.6428.0%
2005$1.47B$1.1321.4%



The estimated consumption is roughly 1.5B gallons per year. Thus, a 1c change in price results in 15M change to bottom-line.

Summary:

Southwest is the golden kid of the domestic airline industry as it has managed to stay profitable consistently over the last 35 years, a feat that has never been accomplished by any other domestic airline. Outstanding management and their ability to innovate and optimize Southwest’s operations are directly responsible for this performance. As such, investors should be willing to pay a premium for Southwest shares. Growth prospects in the domestic market are limited but Management has shown a willingness to cautiously enter other potential growth areas such as expansion in the business market and international operations. Given the company’s outstanding performance in the last three decades, timing is right to bet on Southwest growing in new areas in the near future.

Southwest is valued very close to book value. Forward PE is in the 20s as the combination of higher fuel prices and lower demand due to the recession should result in earnings in the low double digits for 2009. As the economy recovers, Southwest’s earnings prospects should improve but it is anybody’s guess as to when exactly it will happen. As such, an investment in Southwest is a gamble on the eventual recovery of the US economy.

Related Posts:

1. Southwest Airlines - An Experience.

eBay (EBAY) – Stock Analysis

Introduction:

eBay while fast gaining grounds as a household name is also the ultimate Internet platform provider and a key player in the three fields of retail, credit, and communications:
  1. Retail: In this space, though they play second fiddle as they are involved only in the secondary market (small retail, liquidation, used, out-of-season, etc.), they cover about 60% of the overall market. The bulk of this business is done through eBay.com. The primary market is controlled by the large retailers.
  2. Credit: PayPal is marketed as the global Internet payment network – the eventual aim is to establish themselves as the de facto online payment process for all transactions conducted between buyers and sellers. Logically this business belonged in the aisle controlled by the large credit-card networks such as Visa, MasterCard, and American Express for whom the infrastructure was already in place. Capitalizing on their inability to accommodate the Internet transaction processing model, PayPal scored perfectly by providing a platform for flexible payments that requires only an email address and password.
  3. Communication: Skype aims for fundamental change by enabling conversations between people using software and Internet. This compares very favorably to the business model of large-cap companies in the communication space that primarily rely on monetizing private networks which are by nature capital-intensive.

The sparkle behind eBay.com is that in spite of their vast presence in the secondary retail space, they carry neither inventory nor compete with other retailers. This essentially exempts them from the capital-intensive nature of the retail business. The platform they provide does ensure a fee from every transaction conducted between buyers and sellers. Their formula for a successful growth business is a reliable platform without any scalability or performance issues and focus on customer satisfaction. The first-mover advantage, especially pronounced in the Internet arena, should help them grow at a steady pace as merchants and buyers increasingly flock to the Internet to tap in the key advantage eBay platform holds over the brick-and-mortar model: World-wide market place access. More than 50% of eBay’s revenue is derived from this business.

PayPal is another remarkable business where eBay repeats its hands-off approach to perfection – a large presence in that sector on the Internet without directly issuing credit. The PayPal platform provides buyers with a PayPal account allowing for payment from their existing bank accounts or credit cards. This spares PayPal from agonizing over issuing credit, managing interest rates, etc and instead streamline by making the platform reliable and increasing customer focus. The business model parallels that of eBay.com in that every transaction between buyers and sellers conducted through a PayPal account adds to their revenue. Likewise, the first-mover advantage should again allow growth at a healthy pace.

Skype sports the biggest addressable market among eBay’s businesses. Though not quite as seasoned as eBay.com and PayPal, it is growing at a faster pace. Minimal capital requirements and customer acquisition costs make for a high-margin business. Skype is very much an independent entity and there is no real synergy compared to eBay’s other businesses. Sell-side analysts of eBay tout this in negative favor.

Business Issues:

Failure to innovate has landed eBay.com in a brutally competitive environment. They completely missed the local market allowing Craigslist to seize monopoly in that space. eBay’s management failed to recognize the immense potential of that market as a gateway into contextual ads – on the outward, transactions are one on one reducing the odds of monetizing and that closed mind-set cost them that market. eBay.com is also subjected to immense pressure from sites specializing in certain areas of the secondary market. A comparison of the number of active listings in one of those specialty sites and the same category within eBay easily demonstrates how short eBay.com comes. For e.g, on comparing the active listing at stampwants.com, a site specializing in philately and the listing with that of eBay category “stamps” it is evident that stampwants.com can easily trump eBay stamps category by a margin of almost 1:2. This fundamental problem can be traced to eBay management not recognizing the intricacy behind the specialized needs of individual categories within eBay and failing to provide a platform geared towards the requirements of that market.

PayPal has a few of strategic issues:
  1. Merchant fees: PayPal charges a flat fee independent of the source of payment. Credit card payments involve a cost to PayPal as they don the guise of a giant merchant, processing transactions on their merchant’s behalf. The fee charged by the credit card company on the transaction volume is borne by PayPal. For payments from a bank account, such a fee is absent. Should an overwhelming number of customers resort to making payments using their credit card instead of using their bank account/PayPal account balance (default), then PayPal earnings dip. Writing is on the wall for that shift since credit cards offer the dual benefit of earning credit card rewards and added protection. PayPal recently announced a rewards program called eBay Bucks for buyers who pay with PayPal. While this is indeed a start, it still skirts the core issue - the rewards program should be dependent on the funding mode.
  2. PayPal Plus: PayPal Plus is PayPal branded credit card. It is a MasterCard issued by GE Money Bank. The benefit of such a branded card is not obvious especially when the credit (GE Money Bank) and the infrastructure (MasterCard) are both provided by partners. The associated rewards program is average – roughly 1% (slightly tiered) as vouchers that can be used for PayPal purchases. Higher incentives need to be in place for purchases at eBay.com to get customers into using this card.
  3. PayPal use outside eBay.com: During 2008, PayPal’s payment volume off eBay equaled volume on eBay. This underscores PayPal’s huge growth potential in the general eCommerce area. eBay needs to be especially aggressive in this area as the risks and rewards are huge.
  4. Bill Me Later: eBay acquired this business in October 2008 marking their entry into the consumer credit business. Their business model is very different compared to the rest of the PayPal and eBay business. The arrangement is indirect – though the credit is funded by CIT bank, the associated risk remains as Bill Me Later purchases the receivable on the consumer loan extended by the bank. It remains to be seen how this purchase will pan out as it is a completely new area, although admittedly, it complements PayPal’ payment platform. The loan portfolio currently stands at around $600M and directly dependent on its movement is the associated risk or reward. This dependency lays bare eBay’s vulnerability to the vagaries of consumer credit environment.
Skype has a very large addressable market, but there is no denying that their playing field is very crowded and dominated by phone companies with deep pockets. The existing infrastructure investments of these companies are immense giving them all the more reason to protect their territory. Skype on the other hand celebrates its low capex spending and high margins. Sooner than later, Skype will hit a brick wall worldwide as the competition offers high loyalty incentives. For Skype to continue growing at the startup pace, they will require a strategy aimed towards building clientele at a rapid pace. As Skype’s business has little or no synergies with the rest of the eBay, eBay has announced the intent of spinning off Skype as an IPO.

Finances:

Below is a table that summarizes eBay’s financial position:


Year200620072008
Revenue5.97B7.67B8.54B
Net Earnings1.125B1.74B1.80B
Shares Outstanding1.425B1.376B1.303B
Earnings per Share0.791.26*1.38
YOY PE Growth11.3%59%9.5%
YOY Revenue Growth33%28.5%11.34%
Net Margin18.8422.6921.08


*Impairment of good will is excluded.

It is obvious from the YOY (year over year) growth rates in the spreadsheet that eBay’s overall business has slowed over the last three years. This is particularly of concern considering the 2.2B spent on acquisitions over that same period. This tallies eBay’s problems with respect to Business Issues discussed. Despite this, cash equivalents (after taking out debt) have remained strong at close to $3B as net margin has remained steady at around the 20% range.

Summary:

eBay has a very strong business model with an exemplary balance sheet. Despite several business hiccups over the years, the fact remains their assets are extremely valuable. Going forward, if management focuses on providing a better platform that addresses both merchant and buyer issues, there is potential for growth in both their primary businesses. Overall, the Skype spin-off is a good strategy as that should allow for Skype to raise capital to invest in acquiring customers into the Skype platform worldwide – a plan sorely in need.

On a valuation basis, eBay has traded at a compelling valuation of just one-time revenue within the last year. It has since bounced back 70% beating the overall market bounce by a wide margin. Even now, the stock trades at under two-times revenue and a PE ratio in the low-teens. This is one of the few technology companies in our watch list and we continue to scout for a good entry point.

Triple Leveraged ETFs - An Introduction

The Triple Leveraged ETFs which debuted in November 2008 is still considered as a relatively new product from Direxion. Direxion is a 1997 private enterprise focused in specialized investment products. Below is a list of some of the most popular Direxion Triple Leveraged ETFs:



ProductTicker SymbolPerformance Benchmark
Direxion Energy Bear 3X SharesERY300% the inverse of the return of an investment in the Russell 1000 Energy Index.
Direxion Energy Bull 3X SharesERX300% the return of an investment in the Russell 1000 Energy Index.
Direxion Financial Bear 3X SharesFAZ300% the inverse of the return of an investment in the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index.
Direxion Financial Bull 3X SharesFAS300% of the return of an investment in the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index.
Direxion Large Cap Bear 3X SharesBGZ300% the inverse of the return of an investment in the Russell 1000 large-cap index.
Direxion Large Cap Bull 3X SharesBGU300% of the return of an investment in the Russell 1000 large-cap index.
Direxion Small Cap Bear 3X SharesTZA300% the inverse of the return of an investment in the Russell 2000 small-cap index.
Direxion Small Cap Bull 3X SharesTNA300% of the return of an investment in the Russell 2000 small-cap index.


The 300% leverage is achieved by using futures contracts and swap contracts. Below is a look at how the expenses associated with leverage affects the overall performance (taken from Direxion leveraged fund introduction sheet):



ProductFormulaExpected Return Sample
3X Bull FundsDaily Benchmark Return * Daily Beta - Daily Interest Expense – Daily Fund Expense Ratio2.00% * 3.0 - 0.03% - 0.005% = 5.965%
3X Bear FundsDaily Benchmark Return * Daily Beta + Daily Investment Income – Daily Fund Expense Ratio2.00% * 3.0 + 0.06% + 0.005% = 6.065%


The expected return sample assumes a benchmark return of 2% for the bull fund and a -2% return for the bear fund. As shown, the impact of expenses is minimal on a daily basis – in fact, for the bear fund, there is investment income associated with creating the leverage as opposed to an expense for the bull fund because, the bear fund uses short-selling which realizes income that can be invested to produce daily income.

The question to help figure out the risk associated with the leverage is: What happens to an investment in one of these funds (either bull or bear), if the associated index goes up more than 33.34% one day and follows it up with a 33.34% down day? – The answer is that your investment will go to zero – the up-day will wipe out the bear fund while the down-day will wipe out the bull fund. Such an outcome is unlikely but helps demonstrate the fact that in volatile markets that lack direction, these investment options can lose value very quickly. A more realistic example in a market that lacks direction using FAS and FAZ and assuming FAS and FAZ along with the associated index value is all at 100 at the start of the first trading day:




End of Day
Index Performance PercentageIndex ValueFAS ValueFAZ Value
One-3.0097.0091.00109.00
Two+3.0099.9199.1999.19
Three-5.0094.9184.30114.07
Four+10.00104.41109.5979.85


So, over the course of just 4-days, there is an underperformance - FAS should have been at 113.23 and FAZ should have been at 86.77. Another example that uses FAS and the same assumptions in a market that is in a steady up-trend follows:



End of DayIndex Performance PercentageIndex ValueFAS ValueFAZ Value
One+3.00103.00109.0091.00
Two+2.00105.06115.5485.54
Three+5.00110.31132.8772.71
Four+4.00114.72148.8163.98


In this scenario, there is an outperformance when compared to the target index value at the end of the fourth day – FAS should have been 144.16 and FAZ should have been at 55.84. Similar outperformance exists in a steady down-market as well.

Summary:

It is critical to understand the use of leverage and how it impacts the performance of the funds over a period of time. Since these funds track the performance of the associated index at 3 X (or inverse) leverage on a DAILY basis, it is not possible to mimic the performance of the associated index over a period of time. As the latter spreadsheets indicate, if one can guess the market direction correctly, the funds can provide outperformance over the period of time anticipated. Conversely, in a market that lacks direction, these funds are unsuitable.

The legitimate question that begs is if one can get 3X leverage using these funds, why not funds that have leverage 5X, 10X, 100X, etc. Presumably, one can strike gold overnight by guessing the market direction correctly for a single day by holding a 100X leveraged fund. While the advantage is undeniable, technically it is impossible to increase leverage much further – margin requirements limit the amount of leverage possible. A commonly overlooked factor is that the chances of these funds going to zero over a short period of time increases as the leverage increases. Looking at the performance of FAZ/FAZ since its inception should make this pretty obvious - both these indexes show large negative returns over the few years since inception, indicating a strong possibility of both going to zero eventually.

We have nibbled a few times on FAS/FAZ per our previous tweets and blog posts. Following the March lows, we entered FAS for four days realizing a good return and followed it up with a few intra-day round trips that had a net effect of a small positive return. Our opinion is that these products are suitable for the following scenarios:
  1. The benchmark index is at extremely overbought levels. Entering the bear-funds at such levels should prove beneficial over the short-term (a few days).
  2. The benchmark index is at extremely oversold levels. Entering the bull-funds at such levels should prove beneficial over the short-term (a few days).
  3. You anticipate a steady bull/bear market for the benchmark index. Entering the bull/bear funds during such market conditions should prove beneficial over the anticipated period (longer term).
  4. Day trading – when the benchmark index is extremely volatile, there is an opportunity to do roundtrips to realize small profits (intra-day).

Because of the leverage and associated risks, the above strategies should only be used with small portions of your overall portfolio. But, the risk-reward ratio is good assuming your strategies are sound and comfortable to work with.

Related Posts:


1. Mutual Funds and Exchange Traded Funds - An Introduction.
2. Triple Leveraged ETFs - An Introduction.

Last Updated: 10/2011.

Mutual Funds and Exchange Traded Instruments (ETFs, ETNs, and CEFs) – An Introduction

Mutual funds (open-end fund) draw on money from investors to acquire stocks, bonds, or other assets. In return investors receive shares of the mutual fund proportional to these invested assets. The funds are considered open-end for the reason that shares can be continually issued or redeemed based on investor demand. Also absent for mutual funds is the secondary market– Investors buy shares from the mutual fund and redeem it by selling it back – no trading occurs between investors. On the other hand, with exchange traded instruments (ETFs, ETNs, and CEFs), shares outstanding increase or decrease less frequently and only in large chunks (multiple of “creation units”). They are called Exchange Traded as there is a secondary market for these instruments where they can be traded identical to any other stock.

The spreadsheet below compares the features of exchange traded instruments with mutual funds:








































Comparison TermMutual FundExchange Traded Instruments
Trades in an ExchangeNo – bought/sold from/to the mutual fund companyYes – Trades just like a stock.
PriceNet Asset Value (NAV) at the End of the Trading DayMarket Value that varies through-out the day. Could trade at a premium or discount to NAV.
Purchase CostsMore – except no-load mutual funds that do not have front and back-end loads – they still charge a small fee in most casesLess – Brokerage fees and the bid-ask spread which is both relatively small.
Ongoing FeesMore – Actively managed funds have much higher fees while index mutual funds have lower fees although usually not as low as comparable Exchange Traded InstrumentsLess.
Automatic Dividend ReinvestmentYesNo
OptionsNo – not traded in stock exchanges at allYes
Granular Purchase OptionYes – you can buy for any amount as long as minimums are metNo – you have to purchase whole shares (not fractional).
Minimum Investment RequirementsMostly YesNo with some exceptions
Portfolio TurnoverMore – no protection against other investors redeeming shares thereby forcing the fund to realize capital gains/lossesLess – Immunity from tax consequences due to other investor activity
Capital Gains TaxesYes – ongoingNo – only when sold.
Cash Drag (Performance impact due to holding cash instead of other investments)More – mutual funds usually hold more cash to satisfy on-going redemptionsLess – with certain exchange traded instruments that are structured as Unit Investment Trust there can be a cash drag because of a regulatory requirement to hold dividends in non-interest bearing accounts until distribution.


The three types of Exchange Traded Instruments (ETF, ETN, and CEF) can be summarized as:

ETF:

- With an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF), assets are acquired by selling large blocks of shares called “creation units.” Selling large blocks is a regulatory requirement and allows for the formation of a secondary market. Since no money is exchanged in the primary market (creation units are exchanged for large blocks), there is no tax event at that level. The creation units are sold, after being separated into a large number of individual shares, thus forming the secondary market.

ETN:

- Exchange Traded Notes (ETN) is structured as a debt instrument. Debt instruments by nature are prone to credit risk – risk involved with the debtor (in this case the entity that issues ETNs) not honoring the obligation. This situation arises if the issuing entity goes bankrupt or runs into financial trouble. ETN’s promise a return tied to an index or other market benchmark (less fees). As with ETFs, “creation units” and secondary market creation are applicable to ETNs too. However, ETNs are a riskier investment option due to the added credit risk involved – this risk is somewhat mitigated by the fact that issuing agencies usually have good credit ratings.

CEF:

- Closed End Funds (CEF) are launched through an Initial Public Offering (IPO) process and the funds realized are then invested. Shares are traded in stock exchanges thereby forming the secondary market. Since a fixed amount of money is raised at IPO, shares outstanding remain stable.

Below is a spreadsheet that summarizes how they differ from each other:


































Comparison TermETFETNCEF
Investor HoldsShares that represent assets heldShares that represent a Senior Debt ContractShares that represent assets held.
RecourseAssets HeldIssuer CreditAssets Held
RiskMarketMarket & IssuerMarket. The portfolio may use leverage which is an additional risk.
Institutional (multiple of creation unit) RedemptionCustodianIssuerNA
Benchmark Tracking ErrorYesNo – it is a prepaid contractYes
ValuationNet Asset Value (NAV) – usually trades close to this valueIndicative Value based on associated benchmark levelNet Asset Value (NAV) – can trade at a significant premium or discount.
MaturityNone – investors can redeem anytime at multiples of “creation unit”Varies – can be a few years to 30 years or more – investor receives cash that conforms with the investment return promised (benchmark return minus fees) None, although there are exceptions
DistributionsYes - dividendsNoneYes - dividends
Tax TreatmentDividends taxed on an on-going basis. Capital gains taxed when sellingNo on-going taxes. Capital gains taxed when sellingDividends taxed on an on-going basis. Capital gains taxed when selling



Summary:

There are several thousands of mutual funds with more than ten trillion in assets under management. This compares to around thousand exchange traded instruments with close to a trillion in assets. Even so, exchange traded instruments offers far more flexibility and the fees on the average are fewer explaining the faster growth of exchange traded instruments compared to mutual funds. There are distinct structural differences within the three exchange traded instruments with associated differences in their investment and risk profiles. As with any investment vehicle, careful consideration needs to be given to these factors before committing money.

Related Posts:

1. Mutual Funds and Exchange Traded Funds - An Introduction.
2. Triple Leveraged ETFs - An Introduction.

Last Updated: 06/2009. 

Labels

401k ( 15 ) ACT ( 1 ) AP ( 4 ) ARIUS ( 1 ) Abad Turtle Beach ( 1 ) Abrams Capital Management ( 5 ) Acoustic Electric Guitars ( 1 ) Acoustic Guitars ( 1 ) Activist ( 4 ) Address Change ( 2 ) Advanced Placement ( 4 ) Akre Capital Management ( 18 ) Alex Roepers ( 5 ) Appaloosa ( 15 ) Arlington Value Capital ( 3 ) Atlantic Investment Management ( 5 ) Ayemenem ( 1 ) BDCs ( 3 ) BP Capital Management ( 2 ) Bangalore ( 3 ) Bangkok ( 2 ) Bannerghatta National Park ( 1 ) Battery Park ( 1 ) Baupost ( 2 ) Baupost Group ( 17 ) Benjamin Graham ( 2 ) Benjamin Graham Model ( 2 ) Berijam Lake ( 2 ) Berkshire Hathaway ( 35 ) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation ( 45 ) Bill Ackman ( 19 ) Bill Gates ( 44 ) Blue Ridge Capital ( 16 ) Blum Capital Partners ( 12 ) Boone Pickens ( 2 ) Brave Warrior ( 3 ) Brave Warrior Advisors ( 20 ) Bruce Berkowitz ( 19 ) Bruce Fund ( 38 ) CANROYs ( 7 ) CBRE ( 2 ) CEF ( 2 ) CLEP ( 1 ) Camcorders ( 3 ) Cantillon ( 12 ) Carl Ichan ( 8 ) Casio ( 2 ) Charles Akre ( 15 ) Charlie Munger ( 41 ) Chase Coleman ( 16 ) Chou Associates ( 29 ) Christmas gifts ( 7 ) Christopher H. Browne ( 7 ) Chuck Akre ( 13 ) Cisco ( 2 ) Class Action Settlements ( 2 ) Coatue Management ( 28 ) Cochin ( 2 ) Consumer Product Reviews ( 29 ) Covered Calls ( 2 ) DAT ( 1 ) DCF ( 2 ) Daily Journal ( 38 ) Dalal Street ( 8 ) Dan Loeb ( 10 ) David Abrams ( 5 ) David Einhorn ( 22 ) David Swensen ( 17 ) David Tepper ( 15 ) David Winters ( 15 ) Digital Piano ( 3 ) Dinakar Singh ( 20 ) Donald Yacktman ( 10 ) Duquesne ( 34 ) ESL Investments ( 14 ) ESPP ( 6 ) ETF ( 2 ) ETN ( 2 ) EXPLORE ( 1 ) Education ( 37 ) Edward Lampert ( 21 ) Egerton Capital ( 43 ) Egypt ( 3 ) Elementary Education ( 10 ) Elementary School Textbooks ( 5 ) Eric Mindich ( 13 ) Eton Park ( 13 ) Everyday Musings ( 58 ) Exam Prep ( 7 ) Exiting the rat race - how to? ( 19 ) FD Laddering ( 1 ) FVE ( 2 ) Fair Value Estimates ( 4 ) Fairfax Financial ( 4 ) Fairfax Financial Holdings ( 14 ) Fairholme ( 19 ) Fairpointe ( 28 ) Family Office ( 18 ) Financial Independence ( 93 ) Fisher Asset Management ( 10 ) Flash Camcorders ( 3 ) Flip ( 3 ) Francis Chou ( 29 ) Frugal Living ( 34 ) Fund Holdings ( 961 ) GMAT ( 1 ) GRE ( 1 ) Genting ( 2 ) Glenn Greenberg ( 24 ) Glenview Capital ( 18 ) Google ( 2 ) Gotham Asset Management ( 7 ) Greenlight Capital ( 22 ) Guitars ( 3 ) HELOC ( 1 ) HOA ( 3 ) Half Marathon ( 2 ) Hawaii ( 2 ) Hedge Funds ( 1230 ) High School Education ( 7 ) High School Textbooks ( 6 ) Holidays ( 3 ) Holyland ( 11 ) Home Improvement ( 2 ) Homes ( 18 ) Homeschool ( 18 ) Houses ( 2 ) Housing ( 3 ) Hykon ( 2 ) Ian Cumming ( 15 ) Icahn Enterprises ( 6 ) Infinuvo ( 6 ) Insurance ( 3 ) Investment Portfolio ( 96 ) Investment Research ( 10 ) Investments ( 7 ) Irving Kahn ( 17 ) Jason Maynard ( 10 ) Jefferies ( 2 ) Jeffrey Bruce ( 39 ) Jeffrey Ubben ( 26 ) Jerusalem ( 2 ) Jim Chanos ( 20 ) Joel Greenblatt ( 7 ) John Armitage ( 44 ) John Griffin ( 16 ) John Paulson ( 17 ) Joho Capital ( 23 ) Jordan ( 3 ) Joseph Steinberg ( 9 ) Julian Robertson ( 4 ) KWA ( 2 ) Kahn Brothers ( 18 ) Kakkanad ( 4 ) Kanyakumari ( 2 ) Kawai ( 2 ) Ken Fisher ( 10 ) Kids ( 49 ) Kids Yamaha ( 3 ) Kindle ( 2 ) Kodaikanal ( 2 ) Korg ( 2 ) Kraft ( 2 ) Kuala Lumpur ( 2 ) Kynikos ( 20 ) LSAT ( 1 ) Larry Robbins ( 18 ) Las Vegas ( 2 ) Leon Cooperman ( 30 ) Leucadia ( 2 ) Leucadia National ( 13 ) Lone Pine Capital ( 9 ) Lou Simpson ( 15 ) MCAT ( 1 ) MFP Investors ( 37 ) MODUS ( 1 ) MSD Capital ( 22 ) Mahabalipuram ( 2 ) Malaysia ( 3 ) Marathon ( 2 ) Mark McGoldrick ( 10 ) Markel ( 24 ) Mason Hawkins ( 4 ) Melinda Gates ( 35 ) Michael Dell ( 22 ) Michael Price ( 40 ) Middle School Education ( 4 ) Middle School Textbooks ( 3 ) Mini Notebook ( 3 ) Mohnish Pabrai ( 22 ) Mount Kellett ( 10 ) Music ( 6 ) Mutual Funds ( 8 ) Nelson Peltz ( 17 ) Netbook ( 4 ) Notebook ( 3 ) O-Duster ( 1 ) Oahu ( 2 ) Ole Andreas Halvorsen ( 10 ) Omega Advisors ( 29 ) Options ( 4 ) PEG ( 2 ) PLAN Test ( 1 ) PSAT ( 1 ) Pabrai Fund ( 17 ) Paulson & Company ( 7 ) Paulson and Company ( 9 ) Pershing Square ( 19 ) Phil Fisher ( 5 ) Philippe Laffont ( 28 ) Piano ( 9 ) Prem Watsa ( 17 ) Property Taxes ( 2 ) R2I ( 24 ) R2I Finances ( 3 ) R2I Housing ( 5 ) RBS Partners ( 19 ) REIT ( 3 ) Raising Kids ( 41 ) Rat Race ( 15 ) Reducing Expenses ( 2 ) Retirement Portfolio ( 9 ) Reviews ( 81 ) Richard C. Blum ( 12 ) Robert Bruce ( 39 ) Robert Karr ( 23 ) Robotic Vacuum ( 4 ) Roland ( 2 ) Roomba ( 10 ) SQ Advisors ( 15 ) Sears ( 12 ) Services - Reviews ( 33 ) Seth Klarman ( 19 ) Shipping ( 5 ) Shopping ( 3 ) Ski ( 5 ) Sled ( 4 ) Solar Stocks ( 13 ) Soros Fund Management ( 14 ) Southeastern Asset Management ( 4 ) Southwest ( 2 ) Stanley Druckenmiller ( 33 ) Statue of Liberty ( 2 ) Stephen Mandel ( 9 ) Stock Analysis ( 84 ) Stock Investments ( 4 ) Stock Portfolio Updates ( 6 ) TOEFL ( 1 ) TPG-Axon ( 20 ) TaxAct ( 3 ) TaxCut ( 1 ) Teacher's Editions ( 5 ) Technology ( 5 ) Test Prep ( 11 ) Thailand ( 3 ) Thekkady ( 2 ) Third Point ( 10 ) Thomas Gayner ( 44 ) Thyra Zerhusen ( 29 ) Tiger Cub ( 34 ) Tiger Global ( 17 ) Tiger Management ( 13 ) Time Square ( 2 ) Travel ( 278 ) Travel Reviews ( 82 ) Trian Fund Holdings ( 10 ) TurboTax ( 3 ) Tweedy Browne ( 10 ) Vacations ( 28 ) ValueAct ( 11 ) ValueAct Holdings ( 8 ) Vancouver ( 2 ) Video ( 3 ) Viking Global ( 10 ) Wallace Weitz ( 18 ) Warren Buffett ( 32 ) Wayanad ( 4 ) Weitz Investment Management ( 17 ) William Von Mueffling ( 12 ) Wintergreen Advisors ( 15 ) YDP ( 1 ) YPG ( 1 ) Yacktman Asset Management ( 10 ) Yale Endowment ( 17 ) Yale University ( 7 ) Yamaha ( 7 ) air asia ( 2 ) airlines ( 2 ) apartments ( 2 ) barbuda ( 2 ) bay area ( 2 ) best sites ( 9 ) books ( 4 ) british honduras ( 2 ) canada ( 4 ) cancun ( 3 ) carl icahn ( 9 ) casino ( 3 ) coin collecting ( 266 ) collectibles ( 266 ) cook islands ( 2 ) coonoor ( 2 ) credai ( 4 ) dry bulk shipping ( 2 ) eReaders ( 2 ) flat ( 4 ) flats ( 2 ) free ( 17 ) frugal ( 3 ) futures ( 2 ) gambling ( 3 ) garmin ( 2 ) george soros ( 27 ) giveaway ( 15 ) gps ( 5 ) hobby ( 17 ) holiday shopping ( 7 ) home ownership ( 5 ) iRobot ( 5 ) india real estate ( 5 ) invesco ( 17 ) investing strategies ( 3 ) israel ( 5 ) kerala real estate ( 5 ) kochi ( 8 ) laptop ( 5 ) long ( 6 ) long call ( 2 ) long puts ( 3 ) memorabilia ( 266 ) mortgage ( 2 ) mysore ( 2 ) numismatics ( 266 ) offers ( 2 ) online tax ( 4 ) ooty ( 2 ) passive income ( 7 ) pattaya ( 2 ) philately ( 283 ) portfolio ( 4 ) product reviews ( 13 ) reading ( 5 ) real estate ( 6 ) schooling ( 2 ) seeking alpha ( 2 ) short ( 5 ) short calls ( 2 ) short put ( 2 ) short puts ( 2 ) short selling ( 13 ) spin-offs ( 2 ) stamp collecting ( 283 ) stocks ( 3 ) summer ( 2 ) tax ( 7 ) theme park ( 2 ) trip report ( 21 ) value investing ( 25 ) wilbur ross ( 17 )