Mutual funds (open-end fund) draw on money from investors to acquire stocks, bonds, or other assets. In return investors receive shares of the mutual fund proportional to these invested assets. The funds are considered open-end for the reason that shares can be continually issued or redeemed based on investor demand. Also absent for mutual funds is the secondary market– Investors buy shares from the mutual fund and redeem it by selling it back – no trading occurs between investors. On the other hand, with exchange traded instruments (ETFs, ETNs, and CEFs), shares outstanding increase or decrease less frequently and only in large chunks (multiple of “creation units”). They are called Exchange Traded as there is a secondary market for these instruments where they can be traded identical to any other stock.
The spreadsheet below compares the features of exchange traded instruments with mutual funds:
The three types of Exchange Traded Instruments (ETF, ETN, and CEF) can be summarized as:
ETF:
- With an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF), assets are acquired by selling large blocks of shares called “creation units.” Selling large blocks is a regulatory requirement and allows for the formation of a secondary market. Since no money is exchanged in the primary market (creation units are exchanged for large blocks), there is no tax event at that level. The creation units are sold, after being separated into a large number of individual shares, thus forming the secondary market.
ETN:
- Exchange Traded Notes (ETN) is structured as a debt instrument. Debt instruments by nature are prone to credit risk – risk involved with the debtor (in this case the entity that issues ETNs) not honoring the obligation. This situation arises if the issuing entity goes bankrupt or runs into financial trouble. ETN’s promise a return tied to an index or other market benchmark (less fees). As with ETFs, “creation units” and secondary market creation are applicable to ETNs too. However, ETNs are a riskier investment option due to the added credit risk involved – this risk is somewhat mitigated by the fact that issuing agencies usually have good credit ratings.
CEF:
- Closed End Funds (CEF) are launched through an Initial Public Offering (IPO) process and the funds realized are then invested. Shares are traded in stock exchanges thereby forming the secondary market. Since a fixed amount of money is raised at IPO, shares outstanding remain stable.
Below is a spreadsheet that summarizes how they differ from each other:
Summary:
There are several thousands of mutual funds with more than ten trillion in assets under management. This compares to around thousand exchange traded instruments with close to a trillion in assets. Even so, exchange traded instruments offers far more flexibility and the fees on the average are fewer explaining the faster growth of exchange traded instruments compared to mutual funds. There are distinct structural differences within the three exchange traded instruments with associated differences in their investment and risk profiles. As with any investment vehicle, careful consideration needs to be given to these factors before committing money.
Related Posts:
1. Mutual Funds and Exchange Traded Funds - An Introduction.
2. Triple Leveraged ETFs - An Introduction.
Last Updated: 06/2009.
The spreadsheet below compares the features of exchange traded instruments with mutual funds:
Comparison Term | Mutual Fund | Exchange Traded Instruments |
Trades in an Exchange | No – bought/sold from/to the mutual fund company | Yes – Trades just like a stock. |
Price | Net Asset Value (NAV) at the End of the Trading Day | Market Value that varies through-out the day. Could trade at a premium or discount to NAV. |
Purchase Costs | More – except no-load mutual funds that do not have front and back-end loads – they still charge a small fee in most cases | Less – Brokerage fees and the bid-ask spread which is both relatively small. |
Ongoing Fees | More – Actively managed funds have much higher fees while index mutual funds have lower fees although usually not as low as comparable Exchange Traded Instruments | Less. |
Automatic Dividend Reinvestment | Yes | No |
Options | No – not traded in stock exchanges at all | Yes |
Granular Purchase Option | Yes – you can buy for any amount as long as minimums are met | No – you have to purchase whole shares (not fractional). |
Minimum Investment Requirements | Mostly Yes | No with some exceptions |
Portfolio Turnover | More – no protection against other investors redeeming shares thereby forcing the fund to realize capital gains/losses | Less – Immunity from tax consequences due to other investor activity |
Capital Gains Taxes | Yes – ongoing | No – only when sold. |
Cash Drag (Performance impact due to holding cash instead of other investments) | More – mutual funds usually hold more cash to satisfy on-going redemptions | Less – with certain exchange traded instruments that are structured as Unit Investment Trust there can be a cash drag because of a regulatory requirement to hold dividends in non-interest bearing accounts until distribution. |
The three types of Exchange Traded Instruments (ETF, ETN, and CEF) can be summarized as:
ETF:
- With an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF), assets are acquired by selling large blocks of shares called “creation units.” Selling large blocks is a regulatory requirement and allows for the formation of a secondary market. Since no money is exchanged in the primary market (creation units are exchanged for large blocks), there is no tax event at that level. The creation units are sold, after being separated into a large number of individual shares, thus forming the secondary market.
ETN:
- Exchange Traded Notes (ETN) is structured as a debt instrument. Debt instruments by nature are prone to credit risk – risk involved with the debtor (in this case the entity that issues ETNs) not honoring the obligation. This situation arises if the issuing entity goes bankrupt or runs into financial trouble. ETN’s promise a return tied to an index or other market benchmark (less fees). As with ETFs, “creation units” and secondary market creation are applicable to ETNs too. However, ETNs are a riskier investment option due to the added credit risk involved – this risk is somewhat mitigated by the fact that issuing agencies usually have good credit ratings.
CEF:
- Closed End Funds (CEF) are launched through an Initial Public Offering (IPO) process and the funds realized are then invested. Shares are traded in stock exchanges thereby forming the secondary market. Since a fixed amount of money is raised at IPO, shares outstanding remain stable.
Below is a spreadsheet that summarizes how they differ from each other:
Comparison Term | ETF | ETN | CEF |
Investor Holds | Shares that represent assets held | Shares that represent a Senior Debt Contract | Shares that represent assets held. |
Recourse | Assets Held | Issuer Credit | Assets Held |
Risk | Market | Market & Issuer | Market. The portfolio may use leverage which is an additional risk. |
Institutional (multiple of creation unit) Redemption | Custodian | Issuer | NA |
Benchmark Tracking Error | Yes | No – it is a prepaid contract | Yes |
Valuation | Net Asset Value (NAV) – usually trades close to this value | Indicative Value based on associated benchmark level | Net Asset Value (NAV) – can trade at a significant premium or discount. |
Maturity | None – investors can redeem anytime at multiples of “creation unit” | Varies – can be a few years to 30 years or more – investor receives cash that conforms with the investment return promised (benchmark return minus fees) | None, although there are exceptions |
Distributions | Yes - dividends | None | Yes - dividends |
Tax Treatment | Dividends taxed on an on-going basis. Capital gains taxed when selling | No on-going taxes. Capital gains taxed when selling | Dividends taxed on an on-going basis. Capital gains taxed when selling |
Summary:
There are several thousands of mutual funds with more than ten trillion in assets under management. This compares to around thousand exchange traded instruments with close to a trillion in assets. Even so, exchange traded instruments offers far more flexibility and the fees on the average are fewer explaining the faster growth of exchange traded instruments compared to mutual funds. There are distinct structural differences within the three exchange traded instruments with associated differences in their investment and risk profiles. As with any investment vehicle, careful consideration needs to be given to these factors before committing money.
Related Posts:
1. Mutual Funds and Exchange Traded Funds - An Introduction.
2. Triple Leveraged ETFs - An Introduction.
Last Updated: 06/2009.
No comments :
Post a Comment