Qiagen NV (QGEN) – Stock Analysis

Introduction:

Qiagen N.V. is a provider of medical sample and assay technologies. The sample technologies collect, stabilize, isolate, and purify biomolecules such as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), ribonucleic acid (RNA) and proteins from any biological sample (blood, bone, tissue, etc) while the assay division is responsible for making the isolated bio-molecules (example – DNA of a specific virus) visible for subsequent detection and analysis. Qiagen has an impressive selection of over 500 products in this space, which are distributed as self-contained kits with automated solutions. The primary customers include molecular diagnostics laboratories (including pharmaceutical/biotech research centers), researchers, and applied testing customers (forensics, animal, and food testing). Qiagen’s assay technologies include the Digene HPV Test considered the gold standard in testing for high-risk types of human papillomavirus, the primary cause of cervical cancer. This technology came with the acquisition of Digene in 2007.

Qiagen was founded in 1984 by Dr. Metin Colpan whose doctoral thesis work pioneered the development of a silica resin based anion-exchanger that could separate nucleic acids from cells – this method was faster and safer than traditional chemical methods. Dr. Coplan patented this technology in 1987 after filing for it in 1983. Their effort to mold the technology for use in a myriad of industries at the very onset did not pan out well and the company went through a rough patch. Fortunes shifted in 1993 when Mr. Coplan under the guidance of new CFO, Mr. Peer Schatz narrowed down the company’s focus to the genetics research market. The company went public in 1996 and since then has enjoyed an amazing run posting an overall return of over 900% in the last fourteen years. One significant management change occurred in 2003 when Dr. Metin Colpan stepped down from his CEO position handing control over to Schatz. Dr. Metin Colpan donned the new role as senior technology adviser, which allowed him to focus on technology and science as opposed to management. This was a win-win arrangement for Qiagen – under new leadership, the company prospered by being the provider of the ‘picks and shovels’ of the biotech ‘gold rush’ through a combination of investments in R&D that paid returns in consistent organic growth and acquisitions.

Business Issues:

Qiagen’s business can be divided into four market categories:
  1. Academic Research: Though the roots of the company are ingrained in this area, projected growth is very low at 3%. Last year, a quarter of the overall sales came from this area, which is down from 40% five years ago.
  2. Pharma/Biotech Research: Though this sector is a stable business for the company, projected growth is only a tad better at 6%. Sales from this area came in just below a quarter of the overall sales, which is only slightly down from the 25% range five years ago.
  3. Molecular Diagnostics (MDx): Growth in Molecular Diagnostics accounts for the bulk of the growth over the last few years. It is projected to grow in the 20-odd-percentage range. Growth in the last few years has beaten that estimate so handsomely that sales from this quarter has approached 50% of overall sales well above the 25% mark set five years ago.
  4. Applied Testing: Although projected growth for this segment is the best (mid-20 percent range), in reality the company has struggled to grow in this niche. Percentage of sales wise, the business accounts for only around 5% of overall revenues, which is below the 10% range in 2006.

The company’s growth projections from 2007 are quite different from what they actually achieved. Below is a graph taken from the presentation ‘Qiagen – Sample and Assay Technologies’ that was given by the CEO Mr. Peer M. Schatz at the 2007 Analyst Meeting:



The slide indicates what was actually achieved, taken from last year’s annual report:




A clear disconnect between the two is apparent and it appears as though the company has abandoned the Applied Testing business, in spite of the highest projected growth. Was it too hard a target to achieve or was it a management miscalculation? Either way, a shareholder has the right to question the competency of the management.

To its credit, the management did an excellent job in growing the MDx business at an accelerated pace than that projected, thereby masking the inadequacies in other areas. A lot of that growth came with the acquisition of Digene – its HPV test product accounts for around 30% of total revenue. A related risk that product carries is that most of the revenues from that product comes from a limited number of reference laboratories and losing one or more of them directly impacts the bottom line. At the Analyst Day in 2010 the CEO’s presentation predictably accented growth in their MDx business. The ‘Qiagen’s 4Ps Strategy in MDx’ presentation endorsed its success in expanding their base profiling business into three other areas – Prevention, Personalized Healthcare, and Point of Need. Management projection is at around 15% CAGR for this business in the next 5 years. Organic growth as an outcome from above-average investment in R&D (10-12% of revenue) along with strategic acquisitions is anticipated to account for this growth. Expectation is to continue the success enjoyed in expanding products on platforms. The QIAensemble platform (Prevention) is used for screening Cancer Dx, Infectious Diseases, Vaginosis, etc. besides its core HPV testing. Likewise, the QIAsymphony (Profiling and Personalized Healthcare) platform is used for profiling HIV, HBV, HCV, etc., in the Profiling area and for KRAS, BRAF, EGFR, etc., in the Personalized Healthcare area. Similar expansion is expected for their ESE Tube Scanner platform that they acquired recently for use in Point of Need applications.

Qiagen’s integrated approach to sample and assay technologies is a competitive edge as quality in sample preparation is a prerequisite for reliable molecular assay solutions. Promega, Life Technologies Corporation (from the merger of Invitrogen and Applied Biosciences) and a host of other companies are in the offing to adopt a similar approach in the future. In the HPV testing arena, the company currently has dominance, as it is undisputed that the test when used alone or in conjunction with the Pap test has the ability to enable significant diagnostic capabilities for cervical disease and cancer. The platform-based automation adds to this advantage. The field is however becoming crowded as competitors like Roche Diagnostics, Gen-Probe, and Hologic are developing and/or marketing FDA approved HPV testing suites.

Below is a look at the company’s sales by geographical region:



As shown, sales outside of the Americas, Germany, and Switzerland is showing a rapidly rising trend with Asia in the vanguard. As a percentage of total sales, the figure is less than 20% and profitability is very low in Asia. There is opportunity for growth both in terms of revenue and income in these areas.

Finances:

Below is a table that summarizes Qiagen’s financial position:


Year200720082009
Revenue0.65B0.89B1.01B
Net Earnings50M90M138M
Shares Outstanding176M204M214M
Earnings per Share0.280.440.64
YOY Earnings Growth(39.13)%57.1%45.45%
YOY Revenue Growth39.49%13.48%13.09%
Net Profit Margin7.7210.0313.64


While the financial figures over the last three years show a rising trend, couple of issues worth noting are:
  • Average share counting is increasing and
  • Earnings growth is very modest when one-time items are removed (normalized earnings).
It is only reasonable to ponder on how effective management has been in increasing shareholder value in the recent past.

Quantitative Rating:

Below is a spreadsheet showing our quantitative rating summary of Qiagen (click for an understanding of the ratings on this spreadsheet):


  • Qiagen scores 5.5/10 on its ability to beat inflation: Return on Equity is modest but Free Cash Flow and Net Margin are both well above average. PEG ratio, a measure of valuation is very rich at 1.63.
  • Corporate Abuse rating drags at 0/10 as their executive compensation is egregious: Corporate Abuse rating is 0/10 as their executive compensation is high, although not egregious: The CEO makes around $1.89M, over 50 times the average worker.
  • Income Generation and Liquidity at 6.67/10: The company doesn’t pay a dividend but the stock is optionable and is very liquid. Our income generation and liquidity rating is above average at 6.67/10.
  • Volatility ranking is an almost perfect 9/10: Beta is outstanding while Debt to Equity Ratio and Earnings Growth Consistency are both well above average.
  • Capacity to increase dividends at 6.33/10: As Qiagen is yet to announce a dividend policy but have good earnings, our rating for the capacity to increase dividends comes in above average at 6.33/10.


The overall quantitative rating or ‘the OFB Factor’ came in at 5.5/10 which is average.


Summary:

Qiagen NV with an enterprise value of $4.42B and a forward PE of 18.38 have grown at a healthy clip on a revenue basis over the last three years but earnings growth has been anemic. Going forward, the company has invested through acquisitions and R&D spending in the Molecular Diagnostics (MDx) area with a projected CAGR for that business in the 15% range. While impressive, the shareholder needs to consider that the other half of the business is not projected to grow very much at all.

Sales outside Americas and EU are an area the company can focus on to realize good growth. It is unclear whether it is a priority with the management. Qiagen’s business enjoys good margins and shows a rising trend in the last three years. Assuming, the pace of acquisitions will slow down as the business matures; scope exists for further margin expansion.

The company has a PEG ratio of 1.63, which indicates that the valuation is very high. Our quantitative analysis showed the company as having a marginally ‘Above Average’ rating. As the valuation is high and there are considerable risk factors, we do not recommend purchase of shares of Qiagen NV stock at this time.

401K & Retirement Accounts 2010 Performance Summary

The total return this year was 14.24%, well below the 33% return we achieved last year. The performance however compares well with the returns of domestic indexes, which are up around 13%, emerging market indexes, which are up around 17%, and other developed market indexes, which are flat. We started the year with an allocation of 37-34-29 among Domestic, International, and Bond Funds respectively and did some minor changes during the year to keep our allocation steady at 37-34-29.

Below is our current portfolio:


Symbol% of PortfolioFund FeesFund Return 2010 (After Fees)Comments
ABF Small Cap Value (AVFIX)5.280.8225.63A Small-cap value fund with about 1.2B of total assets under management.
Artisan Mid-cap Value (ARTMX)2.391.2131.57A mid-cap value fund with about 3.7B of total assets under management.Top 10 holdings account for 30% of assets.
Dodge & Cox Stock Fund (DODGX)6.620.5212.09A Large cap value fund with a history of outperforming the S&P500 index. Has very low turnover ratio. The fund is very big (~70B) and so outperformance may be harder to come by going forward.
Fidelity Diversified International Fund (FDIVX)17.501.007.68Diversified large-cap international growth fund. This fund is very big at over 58B. Turnover is at 58%. Has a history of outperforming its related index, the MSCI EAFE.
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX)4.770.9522.96None.
Fidelity Low Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX)3.890.8320.16None.
PIMCO Total Return Fund (PTTRX)15.69 0.520.46None.
Misc.1.650.000.00
Calomos Growth A (CVGRX)4.331.2220.06A 12B large cap growth fund. The top 10 holdings represent about 27% of assets.
Schwab S&P500 Index (SWPIX)3.430.3612.86An index fund that tracks the performance of the S&P500 index benchmark.
William Blair International Growth (WBIGX)4.171.6717.79A 5B large cap international fund with between 10 and 25% exposure to emerging markets.
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index (VPACX)3.940.2712.29An index fund that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific index benchmark.
Vanguard Inflation Protected Securities (VIPSX)8.110.203.59Invests in inflation indexed bonds (primarily US) with maturities between 7 and 20 years.
Vanguard Emerging Market ETF (VWO)6.990.2517.43None.
Fidelity International Real Estate Stock Fund (FIREX)0.840.966.59None.
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX)3.621.0926.33None.
Fidelity Select Technology (FSPTX)1.430.8826.69A sector specific fund focused on large cap technology stocks with about 2B in assets under management. Top 10 holdings account for 45% of total assets.
Fidelity Select Health Care (FSPHX)1.390.8716.80A sector specific fund focused on large cap healthcare stocks with about 2B in assets under management. Top 10 holdings account for 38% of total assets.
Vanguard Pacific ETF (VPL)0.940.0011.15
Cash and Money Market0.2800None.
Pension Plan2.7303.70Company Fully Vested Cash Balance Pension Plan.

For 2011, we expect minor reallocations to the portfolio. An update will follow. If the market rallies further as the year progresses, we will continue to shift more into bonds and vice-versa.


2010 Stock Portfolio Performance and 2011 Outlook

We started 2010 with about 92% of our portfolio in stocks and the rest in cash. The portfolio size went up by almost 200% during the year, helped by a couple of one-time events: sale of our primary home in the USA as part of our rat-race exit strategy (read more here) that helped release the equity tied up there and certain close-out payments from our previous employments. The cash infusion had the effect of temporarily increasing our cash allocation from just 8% to a whopping to over two-thirds of our total portfolio value. To alleviate market timing risk, we embarked on allocating this cash to stocks over a period of three years. The downside with this strategy is of course that a lot of cash sits on the sidelines for an extended period of time. During the year, we wrote several cash-covered puts and a few covered calls. Most of them expired worthless and so the net effect was that it helped generate some income. The strategy is expected to increase income in the coming years as we use those two vehicles using a maximum of one-third of our total portfolio. The idea is to use options as a nimble way to build a bullish or bearish bias in the portfolio while generating income from a portion of the unallocated cash.
We used direct purchases of stocks to allocate around 40% of our total cash position. Our cash position is still very high at around 46% of our total portfolio value.

Our portfolio is about 3% in the green. Given that we started the year more than 3% down, our performance including the roughly 3% realized gains (includes dividends) came in at just below 9%. It underperformed most of the major indexes - S&P 500 returned around 12.5%, Dow around 11%, and the NASDAQ starred with a 16.9% return. The performance is very respectable when taking into account the fact that on the average about 50% of the portfolio value remained unallocated during the year.

Below is our portfolio as of EOY 2010:



StockBuy DateBuy PriceCurrent PriceCurrent % Of PortfolioUnrealized % ReturnYield as % of Portfolio Value
Altria (MO)Various19.1924.991.9630.220.16
Philip Morris International (PM)1/4/200532.1959.691.8785.420.12
Kraft Foods (KFT)Various26.3331.932.0121.280.09
Pfizer (PFE)Various22.1317.031.87(23.04)0.09
ICICI Bank (IBN)5/18/2006 and 08/01/200825.2849.112.31106.640.11
Central Europe & Russia Fund (CEE)Various39.2341.192.265.010.01
Itron Inc. (ITRI)11/07/200785.0154.440.85(36.04)None
iRobot (IRBT)12/18/200718.6523.061.4524.71None
LDK Solar (LDK)01/22/200830.4910.030.47(67.11)None
Aegon N.V. (AEG)04/28/200815.995.980.28(62.59)0.00
Frontline Limited (FRO)10/06/200836.95 25.031.18(23.84)0.08
DryShips Incorporated (DRYS)02/09/20096.96 5.960.66(14.42)0.00
Plum Creek Timber (PCL)07/23/200930.50 35.592.2416.690.14
CPFL Energia S.A. (CPL)07/28/200950.45 73.412.3145.510.18
BP plc (BP)08/05/200951.49 43.251.36(16.00)0.09
AT&T (T)08/27/200926.38 29.211.8310.710.12
Sysco Corporation (SYY)Various25.92 29.302.3013.030.10
Exelon (EXC)12/30/200949.38 41.081.94(16.81)0.16
Telefonica SA (TEF) 02/09/201068.74 67.622.12(1.70)0.30
Vonage Holdings (VG) 04/06/20101.51 2.370.7456.500
Archer Daniels Midland (ADM)04/23/201028.27 30.031.896.210.09
Intel Corporation (INTC)Various21.9121.462.70(2.06)0.12
Google Inc. (GOOG)05/03/2010528.36 590.801.8611.820
Cardinal Health (CAH) 05/06/201034.42 38.711.8212.460.06
Pearson PLC (PSO) 05/06/201014.32 15.851.7410.660.16
Nokia (NOK) 05/14/201010.359.931.56(4.06)0.16
Harris (HRS) 06/07/201045.65 46.402.194.520.08
Beckton Dickson (BDX) 06/23/201070.20 85.212.6821.380.10
NYSE EuroNext (NYX) 10/22/201030.38 29.851.88(1.74)0.15
Owens & Minor Inc. (OMI) 10/22/201028.11 29.591.865.270.08
Encana (ECA) 11/8/201029.2227.931.75(4.33)0.10
Cash


46.06

Total Portfolio



2.802.72



Below is a summary of transactions during the year:



StockBuy DateBuy PriceSell DateSell Price% Gain (Loss)% Portfolio Return*
Ameritrade (AMTD) 5/21/2008 17.69 01/19/2010 17.45 (1.33) (0.02)
AMTD Jan 17.5 Covered Calls (TQAAW) 1/19/2010NA 9/10/2009 NA NA0.22
COST Jan 60 Covered Calls (PRQAL) 1/19/2010NA 9/10/2009 NA NA0.06
IBN Mar 40 Covered Calls (ITZCN) 1/22/2010NA 10/06/2009 NA NA0.20
Costco (COST) 8/01/2009 62.27 02/09/2010 58.18 (6.57) (0.08)
AAV Aug 7.5 Covered Calls 8/21/2010NA 3/9/2010 NA NA0.06
NTRI Sep 17.5 Puts 9/17/2010NA 4/19/2010 NA NA0.19
IBN Sep 40 Calls 9/18/2010NA 3/5/2010 NA NA0.18
EMR Sep 43 Puts 9/18/2010NA 6/10/2010 NA NA0.12
ICICI Bank (IBN) – Called Away 5/18/2006 27.54 9/18/2010 39.76 44.88 0.43
VFC Nov 70 Puts 10/18/2010 NA 8/21/2010 NA NA 0.10
Anthracite (ACPIQ formerly AHR) 11/9/2007 7.99 10/18/2010 (0.02) (100.20) (0.70)
Advantage Energy Fund (AAV) Various 3.85 11/8/2010 6.50 68.85 0.23
QGEN Nov 17.5 Puts 11/20/2010 NA 7/27/2010 NA NA 0.11
Realized Gain/(Loss) 2010 Including Dividends-----2.84

  • % Gain/Loss Relative to Portfolio Value at Beginning of Year + Deposits
  • The table assumes realization of profits associated with selling options only after the option is exercised or expiry.

We have covered calls written against one-third of our ICICI Bank (IBN) shares (Jan 2012 55). We also have cash covered puts on Ameritrade (AMTD) shares (Feb 2011 15), Cisco (CSCO) shares (Jan 2012 20 at $2.64), Berkshire Hataway (BRK.B) shares (Jan 2012 75 at $7.15), Itron (ITRI) shares (May 2011 60 at $6.90) , Quality Systems (QSII) shares (June 2011 60 at $5.50), Noble Corporation (NE) shares (June 2011 33 at $2.62), Abbott Labs (ABT) shares (Jan 2012 45 at $4.40), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) shares (July 2011 60 at $2.47), H&R Block (HRB) shares (Jan 2012 10 at $1.60 and Jan 2012 12.5 at $2.30), Alcoa (AA) shares (Jan 2012 15 at $1.70), and Nutrisystem (NTRI) shares (June 2011 17 at $1.30) with a cash coverage requirement of about 44% of our cash position.

Tablet PCs – A Comparative Review

This evaluation, part of the series of reviews on best value notebooks and netbooks, is on another class of computers with an even lower form factor than netbooks – Tablet PCs. Tablet PCs differ in that they boast a touch screen and a stylus that allows easy navigation. The stylus permits freehand drawing/writing (uses handwriting recognition software), a cumbersome task to achieve with notebook or netbook.

Though Microsoft coined the term “Tablet PC” in 2001, the first successful mass-market product was the Apple iPad launch on 4/2010. Over the years, Tablet PCs underwent various iterations. Chief among them are the Slate Tablet PCs that was similar to a writing slate and the Convertible Tablet PCs whose swiveling keyboard allowed for dual functionality – slate tablet as well as a netbook. Most Slate Tablet PCs also allow enabling an external keyboard through USB or wireless.

Ample selection is on hand for consumers on the lookout for Tablet Computers. Since the Apple iPad launch, a plethora of announcements and products rumored to have been in concept stage have bombarded the market. Tablet Computers still in concept stage include announcements by Freescale, Foxconn, HTC, MSI, and a prototype by the Government of India for Tablet PCs with an expected price of $35. One major disappointment among the Tablet Computers rumored to have been in the concept stage was from Microsoft when they shelved the MS-Courier product at announcement this April prompting a petition from the Internet community asking them to reconsider this move.

Below is a look at Tablet PCs currently available in the market selected on the basis of web popularity, sorted by price:


ProductThumbnailBest PriceDetails
Archos 7$149Outstanding Value! 8GB HD, 7” TFT LCD touchscreen, Android-based OS, Wi-Fi.
Coby Kyros MID7015 7-Inch Android Internet Connection Tablet$154Great low-cost alternative as a media and internet device. Android 2.1 OS, 7-inch resistive tourchscreen, microSD card slot up to 16GB, built-in 4GB, Accelerometer, EBook reader, 3200 mAH battery.
Zenithink 10” Touchscreen Android 2.1 Tablet$210Great choice for early adopters who do not mind firmware upgrades and other optimizations. Android 2.1 OS, 1080p HD video, MicroSD Card Slot.
Velocity Micro T301 Cruz 7-Inch Android Tablet$220Read Kindle books in full color. 4GB Internal, Android-Based OS, Cruz Market interface to download/install other apps.
Motion Computing Le1600$265Good choice for people those who want to stick with the ubiquitous Windows XP. Windows XP Tablet PC – superset of XP professional, 60GB HD, 1.5GB RAM, View anywhere screen, Bluetooth, Full Digitizer Pen.
iRobot Google Android 2.1 Apad$300Apple iPad clone that runs on Google Android. PDF, Word, Excel, Email. 128MB RAM and 4GB storage, WiFi, GPS via Google Maps.
Compaq TC1100 Tablet PC$3202003 Model. Windows XP Tablet Edition OS. 512MB RAM, 40GB HD.
Viewsonic G-Tablet $440Great Apple iPad alternative for folks willing to invest in enhancing the user experience – ROM replacement, etc. Solid cutting-edge hardware, but firmware replacement is a must as the in-built one is below par. 10” Multi-Touch LCD Screen Android OS 2.2, MicroSD slot upto 32GB, 16GB HD, 3D-Like graphics – NVIDIA Tegra 2 Processor, Virtual QWERTY keyboard, 8-10 hour battery – 3650mAH Li-ion.
Toshiba Portege m200$450Another 2003 Edition Windows XP Tablet for folks wanting to tinker with older models and/or wanting to stick with Windows XP.
ASUS Eee PC T101MT-EU27-BK Convertible Tablet$459Great choice for folks having a hard time to choose between a netbook and tablet. Item ATOM N455 CPU, Winodws 7 Starter OS, Multi Touch when loaded with Windows 7 Home Premium. 250GB, 3 USB Ports, 6.5 hour battery.
Apple iPad (16 GB WiFi)$499First machine to make truly mobile computing a reality! 9.7” LED-backlit glossy mult-touch display, 16GB flash drive, Wi-Fi Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR, 256MB RAM, iWorks utilities for laptop-like functionality, 10-hour battery. There are versions with additional HD space and 3G for up to $300 more.
Lenovo Ideapad S10-3t Netbook Tablet$499Touch Tablet with 180-degree screen rotation. NaturalTouch panel, Wi-Fi, Windows 7 Home Premium, Webcam, Sterio speakers, 1.3M webcam, Card reader, USB 2.0 connectors, 250GB HD, 4-cell Li-Ion battery (3 hours). No Bluetooth.
Hewlett Packard TM2T Tablet PC$1050Good choice for folks having a hard time deciding between netbook and tablet at a higher price point than the ASUS. Comes with Windows Home Premium 64-bit standard, Touchscreen, WEBCAM, Intel Wireless-N Card.
Fujitsu LifeBook TH700 Tablet PC$1050Another good choice between netbook and a true tablet. Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit, 2GB Memory, Intel Core i3, Card Reader, DVD Writer, bi-directional display hinge with dual digitizer, 320GB HD.


To do a Best Value comparison of Tablet Computers, we chose four best values from the spreadsheet above. Below is a look at our selections and a comparative spreadsheet:


Product/FeatureArchos 7Apple iPadLenovo Ideapad S10-3tFujitsu Lifebook TH700
Thumbnail
Best Price$149$499$499$1050
TypePure TabletPure TabletHybrid – Netbook TabletHybrid LIFEBOOK Tablet
Base Hardware600 MHz ARM Cortex-A8 32 bit processor and 32-bit DSP, 439MHz1GHz Apple A4 custom-designedIntel Atom 1.66 GHz N450Intel Core i3-350M 2.26 GHz
Base SoftwareLinuxiPhone OSWindows 7 Home PremiumWindows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
ConnectivityWi-Fi (802.11 b/g), USB 2.0Wi-Fi (802.11a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 2.1 + EDRWi-Fi (802.11b/g/n)Wi-Fi (802.11b/g/n), Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR, 1000/100/10Mbps Ethernet, Modular Bay.
Size & Weight8x4.2x0.5 inches, 10.6 ounces9.56x7.47x0.5 inches, 1.5 pounds6.9x11x1.1 inches, 2.8 pounds11.69x9.17x1.43 inches, 4.4 pounds.
Screen7-inch TFT LCD touchscreen 800x480, 16m colors, matte9.7-inch LED-backlit glossy widescreen multi-touch, 1024x768, oleophobic coating, multi-language character simultaneous support10.1 inch LED backlight 16:9 widescreen with NaturalTouch (responsive fingertip touch), 180-degree screen rotation12.1 inch WXGA TFT with dual digitizer 1280x800, anti-glare.
Memory128MB512MB1GB4GB
Storage8GB16GB250GB320GB
Battery7-hours9-hours3-hours (4-cell)4.56 hours (6-cell)
OthersVirtual Keyboard and Auto-firmware updates. There is a new version with Android 2.1 Éclair and new 800MHz processor for around $30 more. Ambient Light Sensor, Dock connector port, headphone jack, built-in speaker, microphone, multi-language, multi-docsActive HD Protection System, Instant ON, OneKey Rescue, DirectShare, Card Reader & USB 2.0, 1.3M web camera. Dual Layer Super Multi Writer, Intel HD Graphics, RealTek stereo speakers, HD Audio-in/out, 2M web camera, Spill-resistant keyboard, Intelligent Touch Pad, ExpressCard & SD slots, USB 2.0x3, firewire, external display, HDMI-out.


Summary & Recommendation:

Choosing among our best value selections simmers down to establishing a price range and going by preferred hardware/software. At the low end, the ARCHOS 7 Home Tablet is an outstanding value – an Android-based tablet with reasonable functionality for $149 is great for anyone looking for something which is in between a smartphone and a notebook. Overall size and weight makes this choice an ultra-mobile option. Firmware updates are a necessary evil and that is the one downside for the technically challenged.

Choosing between the Apple iPad and Lenovo S10-3t is purely a matter of personal preference than anything else. Sure, Lenovo beats Apple iPad hands-down when comparing the specs, but that won't make a believer out of a diehard Apple fan.

Fujitsu Lifebook TH700 grays out the line between a Netbook and a Tablet. Size-wise, this tablet is heavier and bulkier than most netbooks, but the bonus is the superset of the functionality in both. It is a great choice, for those in pursuit of the complete functionality of a laptop (swappable bay, external keyboard/screen etc through USB, and performance) as well as a tablet (touchscreen, drawing, and other IPAD functionality). This is a great alternative for those seeking to replace existing computing machine (laptop/desktop) while also adding tablet features.

Related Posts:
  1. Best Values in Netbooks & Notebooks - A Comparative Review.
  2. Best Value Portable Computers for Students (Laptops, Netbooks, and MacBooks) - A Comparative Review.
  3. Tablet PCs - A Comparative Review.

Last Updated: 02/2011.


    Labels

    401k (24) Advanced Placement (4) airlines (2) AP (4) barbuda (2) bay area (2) BDCs (4) beating inflation (16) best sites (9) books (3) Business (44) Camcorders (3) cancun (3) CANROYs (9) Carnival (19) Carnivals (35) casino (3) Casio (2) CEF (2) Class Action Settlements (2) Consumer Product Reviews (30) Covered Calls (22) Credit (45) Debit (33) Digital Piano (3) Direxion (2) dry bulk shipping (4) Economy (33) Education (21) Elementary Education (10) Elementary School Textbooks (5) eReaders (2) ESPP (6) ETF (2) ETN (2) Everyday Musings (63) Exiting the rat race - how to? (22) Financial Independence (206) Flash Camcorders (3) Flip (3) free (17) Frugal Living (72) gambling (3) garmin (2) giveaway (15) gps (3) High School Education (7) High School Textbooks (6) hobby (47) home ownership (5) Homes (14) Homeschool (18) Infinuvo (7) Investment Portfolio (198) Investment Research (7) Investments (18) iRobot (3) Kawai (2) Kids (73) Kids Yamaha (3) Kindle (2) Korg (2) laptop (5) Las Vegas (2) Middle School Education (4) Middle School Textbooks (3) Mini Notebook (2) mortgage (2) Mutual Funds (4) Netbook (3) Notebook (2) Oahu (2) offers (2) online tax (2) passive income (37) philately (61) Piano (5) product reviews (11) Raising Kids (63) Rat Race (16) reading (5) Reducing Expenses (17) REIT (3) Retirement Portfolio (18) Reviews (83) Robotic Vacuum (2) Roland (2) Roomba (10) Roundup (14) Roundups (20) Services - Reviews (37) Ski (5) Sled (4) Solar Stocks (27) Southwest (2) stamp collecting (40) stamps (20) Statue of Liberty (2) Stock Analysis (124) Stock Portfolio Updates (100) stocks (21) summer (2) tax (3) Teacher's Editions (5) Technology (4) Time Square (2) Travel Reviews (52) trip report (13) Video (3) Yamaha (7)

    Google Analytics